Decision-making
Decisions about a proposed action are made throughout the impact assessment process. For example:
- Relevant authorities and proponents make decisions about whether planning for a proposed action should proceed or not at the screening (Section 6.4) and scoping stages (Section 6.5)
- A proponent may decide to change the appropriate action’s location, design, technology, etc. as the action’s impacts are identified and evaluated during an impact assessment (Section 6.8–Section 6.9)
- Major investors, such as development banks or other international financial institutions, use the final impact assessment report to make decisions about whether to fund the proposed action or not
- Relevant authorities will use the final impact assessment report as the basis on which to make a decision regarding the approval for the proposed action and, if it goes ahead, under what conditions.
The ultimate decision on whether a proposed action should be approved or not will be made by the relevant national authorities. There are three options for such a decision:
- Approval is given, including specific conditions (e.g. mitigation measures). This should only happen where the proposed action, with conditions, would avoid all negative impacts on OUV, or if any negative impacts are too minor to merit further consideration
- Approval is deferred, for example, awaiting additional information or on the basis of requests for the proposed action to be redesigned
- Approval is denied.
are expected to take these decisions in light of their obligations under the ; the impact assessment should help inform those decisions. An impact assessment in a World Heritage context is intended to ensure that a proposed action’s potential impacts on OUV are fully considered in decision-making, with the objective of safeguarding these exceptional places. All proposed actions, whether they are located in or near the , should be considered in terms of whether they are compatible with the long-term conservation of OUV. The assessment should also consider the property’s connections to its wider setting, as World Heritage cannot be considered in isolation. Proposed actions that are not compatible with this objective should not be approved.