Impact assessment
- examines whether and how a proposed policy, plan or project impacts on the environment and on heritage places.
- on a should address the OUV specifically, as well as other heritage/conservation values.
- have an obligation to notify the UNESCO in advance before considering any proposed action that may have an impact on World Heritage.
The practice of impact assessment has spread around the world since the 1970s and there is a system for it in nearly every country in the world. The World Heritage Committee is increasingly requesting
to carry out impact assessments in order to meet their obligations and make better informed decisions that prevent negative impacts and optimize positive benefits that can come from proposed actions.
come in different forms but those that are most commonly
carried out at a heritage place are:
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA): these look at the potential positive and negative impacts of policies, plans or programmes that could affect a heritage place. By taking a strategic overview on a large landscape scale and considering cumulative impacts, such assessments have the advantage of being proactive in considering heritage before any specific changes are being proposed. This can provide a framework when considering individual projects, developments and uses in and around World Heritage.
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA; also referred to as Environmental Impact Assessment or EIA): these are assessments of the potential positive and negative impacts of a specific project on the environmental and social aspects of a place, including heritage. If an assessment of a project looks largely at the potential impacts on heritage values, then it is often referred to as a (HIA).
In the context of any type of impact assessment, the term ‘environment’ is used in its broadest sense and includes physical, biological, social and cultural aspects of a place. So any of these assessments can be applied to natural and cultural heritage places and should consider the full range of heritage values, the attributes that convey them and the interplay between these attributes. In the context of World Heritage it is important that there is a focus on identifying and assessing negative and positive impacts on the attributes which convey the OUV of the .
There is an advantage to using the different types of impact assessment as complementary processes. An SEA can provide a strategic framework that already includes heritage considerations which can be applied to assess individual projects in an ESIA/HIA. For example, an SEA can help ensure that a new regional land-use plan takes heritage values into consideration, defining appropriate uses for different areas in and around a . Subsequently, that land-use plan can be used to ensure that only suitable projects are proposed for each area and ESIA/HIAs can then assess those individual project proposals to ensure they are aligned. Such an approach is also useful to reduce the number of individual ESIA/HIAs and also to understand the cumulative impacts of multiple projects within and around the same heritage place.
There are a range of factors which can affect a heritage place, many of which are planned in advance such as creating infrastructure or buildings, new forms of biological resource use, or new activities that create pollution.
is a methodology that helps inform decision-making at places where there is a proposed action with potential impacts that can be evaluated in advance. By ensuring that an impact assessment fully takes into consideration OUV and other heritage values, it can help improve planning, as well as inform good decision-making about whether a proposed action should take place or not. Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines requests that the World Heritage Committee be notified in advance of any significant project that might affect a
before any irreversible decisions or actions are taken.
are mandatory for World Heritage (OG, 118bis) and support
in meeting their obligations under the Convention, reassuring the Committee that there will be no negative impacts on the OUV.
It is important that impact assessment takes a holistic approach to World Heritage and benefits from applying a heritage place approach.
needs to consider the type, size and characteristics of the proposed action; the sensitivity of the receiving environment; and the types of likely impacts. It is not only large development projects, or proposed actions near a
, that need impact assessment and, as World Heritage properties are of international importance, any proposed action that may affect the property’s OUV should require an impact assessment, regardless of its size or location, within the property, its buffer zone or wider setting. A series of smaller proposed actions, while not needing impact assessment on their own, may also need to be checked for their indirect and
cumulative impacts on a
.
The current state of the , its OUV and attributes, constitutes the baseline of impact assessment, which should compare the future of the with and without the proposed action. The baseline can also be used as a reference point to monitor the situation during and after project construction, to ensure the heritage is protected.
Analysis of the management system of the heritage place is needed for impact assessment. The consistency of the proposed action with existing policies and legislation needs to be reviewed, from national, regional and local policies and land-use plans relating to heritage and the attributes that support the ’s OUV. This allows a critical understanding of how the proposed action might affect the management system, and also the capacity of that management system to implement any proposed mitigation measures and monitor the actions implementation. Any previous Advisory or Reactive Monitoring mission reports, and impact assessments related to the , should also be reviewed to understand any key management concerns.
If there are any SEAs that were previously prepared for plans and policies that set the context for the proposed action, they can help identify strategic level alternatives and why they have been eliminated or chosen; expected mitigation measures; reasons why previous actions have been permitted or refused; and cumulative impacts that could be exacerbated or reduced by the proposed action.
Throughout the entire impact assessment process, the aspects of participation and proactive problem-solving are crucial. It is important that rights-holders, local or other associated communities, managers and any relevant stakeholders, are included appropriately through a range of engagement methods that can be used throughout the assessment. The process of impact assessment is an opportunity to consider a proposed action in advance and think creatively about whether it seems appropriate to the heritage place and if it has any potential contribution to sustainable development. A proactive and innovative problem-solving approach can help think ‘outside the box’ to identify alternatives that might be better for avoiding negative impacts while also gaining positive impacts. The more participatory the impact assessment process, the more likely that successful problem-solving takes place. These need to be based on the governance arrangements of the heritage place, through different legal frameworks and actors analysis.
Carrying out an impact assessment is generally easier and more effective where there is a robust management system with effective governance measures – data collection is more straightforward, public input is more easily facilitated, and impacts are easier to monitor and manage. However, even if a does not have a well-functioning management system, impact assessment can help to improve proposed actions. For example, the baseline information collected through the impact assessment process can be used for other management purposes; it can act as a catalyst for stakeholders to come together and promote more participatory decision-making; and it can help to define what type of proposed actions are appropriate for the .
For World properties and other heritage places facing increasing pressure from diverse types of development projects within and around the sites, assessing the impacts of such projects, before deciding to proceed with their implementation, is essential to prevent damage to World and identify sustainable options.
The Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context is the reference that explains the process with practical tips and tools, including checklists and a glossary. It provides a framework for conducting impact assessments for both cultural and natural heritage sites. The Guidance fosters cross-sectoral, multidisciplinary collaboration to identify solutions for both protecting World sites and supporting good quality and appropriate development.
- Are managers clear on the obligations of to the to inform the UNESCO concerning any proposed actions with the potential to impact a ?
- Is it clear which institution is responsible for deciding that SEAs, EIAs and HIAs are carried out for the ?
- Does the screening process for various impact assessment processes include heritage considerations?
- Do those involved in carrying out SEAs, EIAs and HIAs have access to information about the values and attributes of the heritage place, and state of conservation so that these can be used in assessments?
- Are impact assessment processes established to be carried out for any proposed action that may affect the property’s OUV regardless of its size or location?
- UNESCO, ICCROM, ICOMOS, IUCN (2022). Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context.