Reviewing the Report
The impact assessment report (Section 6.11) should be made available for comment to rights-holders, the local community and other stakeholders with direct or indirect interests in the , the , World Heritage Committee, and . Based on the comments received, the report may need to be revised before a final version is formally submitted to decision-makers alongside a planning/licence application or similar (Section 6.13). The aim of the review is to determine whether the assessment methodology and outcomes are adequate, notably in terms of the analysis of impact on OUV; and whether they are fit for purpose in terms of transparency and usability. A good review process leads to confidence in the conclusions of the impact assessment.
Reviews of an impact assessment report can take different forms:
- When the impact assessment is commissioned by the proponent, the proponent often checks, among other issues, that the assessment has been carried out according to the
- When the impact assessment has been requested by the World Heritage Committee, the report and the proposed action will usually be subject to a technical review by the
- When the impact assessment is carried out within a national framework, there is usually a responsible authority who will check against relevant legislation and policy. They may also involve other appropriate departments or agencies for comment
- The report should be shared with all relevant rights-holders and other stakeholders so they have an opportunity to comment meaningfully. Many national frameworks provide an opportunity for public review, and it is good practice to do this even where it is not legally required
- An independent review of an impact assessment may be commissioned through appropriate and accredited independent specialists; this can be particularly helpful in sensitive cases where the quality and transparency of the impact assessment needs to be ensured.
Box 6.7 review checklist
- Does the report address the issues raised in the scoping document?
- Is the report consistent with relevant requirements (e.g. national legislation, donor requirements) on impact assessment?
- Does the report fully address the World context and the OUV of the property?
- Does the report explain whether the proposed action is consistent with relevant policy and regulations on heritage?
- Have rights-holders and other stakeholders been involved in the impact assessment process, and have their views been adequately taken into account?
- Was the impact assessment carried out in line with good impact assessment practice and with this Guidance?
- Is the information provided in the report reliable and technically accurate? Are the conclusions of the report based on adequate evidence? Are there any significant data gaps that require use of the ?
- Has the report clearly identified mitigation measures needed to avoid or minimize impacts on OUV and other heritage/conservation values?
- Is the report clear, complete and fit for the purpose of supporting decision-making?
After the review(s) have taken place, the impact assessment team should incorporate any reasonable feedback or requests into the report as it is finalized. Where the team decides not to incorporate the feedback into the final report, it should explain why this has not been done. The final revised report should be made public. In sensitive cases where this is not feasible, as much transparency as possible should be provided by sharing content that is not problematic and offering a non-technical summary and/or a public presentation to rights-holders and other stakeholders.