Screening: is an Impact Assessment needed?
The first step in the impact assessment process is to decide whether an assessment is necessary. This is known as ‘screening’ and results in a screening decision. Any proposed action should be examined as early as possible to understand whether it is likely to affect a
’s OUV and other heritage/conservation values. When the screening process indicates that a proposed action would potentially have negative impacts, an impact assessment is required and the proponent should be encouraged to review the proposed action and revise it, if necessary, to avoid or minimize those impacts.
involves consideration of the type, size and characteristics of the proposed action; the sensitivity of the receiving environment; and the types of likely impacts (Figure 6.4). It is not only large development projects, or proposed actions near a
, that need impact assessment. As World Heritage properties are of international importance, any proposed action that may affect the property’s OUV should require an impact assessment, regardless of its size or location – within the property, its buffer zone or wider setting (see Section 3.2). A series of smaller proposed actions, while not needing impact assessment on their own, may also need to be checked for their indirect and cumulative impacts on a
.
The screening analysis should consider whether the proposed action could affect the values and attributes that underpin OUV (see Section 3.2). Understanding a
should therefore begin with an analysis of its Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (SOUV) to identify its values and attributes. Tool 1 provides a structured approach to identifying values and attributes based on an SOUV.
Figure 6.4. that should be taken into consideration in impact assessment screening in a World context. Potential impacts on OUV require explicit consideration.
Where the screening stage suggests that no impact assessment is necessary, the proponent should prepare a screening report, based on existing information, that documents:
- The ’s name and a map showing its boundary, buffer zone and (where appropriate) wider setting
- The ’s Statement of Outstanding Universal Value
- The values shown by the
- The attributes that underpin each value
- For each attribute: whether the proposed action will significantly affect that attribute or not. Where there is uncertainty about this, a precautionary approach should be used.
The World Committee has decided that two activities are never considered compatible with World status: extractive activities16 and the construction of dams with large reservoirs. The International Council on Mining and Metals has issued a ‘No-go commitment’ not to explore or exploit for oil, gas or minerals in World properties, and to ensure operations adjacent to World properties are not incompatible with OUV. The International Hydropower Association has similarly committed to a no-go for World and a ‘Duty of care commitment’. Leading global companies have joined this commitment, including mining, oil and gas, insurance and banks. Therefore, a recommendation not to proceed with proposed actions of this type can be made at the screening stage. In addition, any proposed dam that could affect properties located within the same river basin will always require an assessment in order to avoid impacts on OUV.
The World Heritage Committee may also request an impact assessment, for example, after it has received notification of proposed or ongoing action via the UNESCO , in line with Paragraph 172 or 174 of the Operational Guidelines. If the Committee requests an impact assessment, this becomes the responsibility of the State Party concerned. can use the screening process as an opportunity to proactively inform the UNESCO of any proposed actions which may affect a property’s OUV, in line with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines (Section 3.3). The is also expected to follow up on implementation of the World Heritage Committee Decisions and Recommendations of the in this regard.