World Heritage management and governance as a foundation for impact assessment
3.3.1 Management and governance
The procedures for managing properties inscribed on the World Heritage List are set out in the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the . Each State Party has a national authority with a designated to help implement the Convention at the state level. The governance arrangements for properties vary, although a site manager or management team is usually responsible for an individual . The UNESCO can provide contact details for National Focal Points and site managers and provides further information and guidance about the management of natural and cultural World Heritage properties on its website.
3.3.2 Process for requesting an impact assessment
The
is usually responsible for informing the UNESCO
about proposed actions that may affect a property before any irreversible decisions are taken, in line with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines. Site management teams may also draw attention to such actions, identifying the need to notify the UNESCO
and carry out an impact assessment. Civil society representatives and other groups concerned about impacts on World Heritage properties may also contact the UNESCO
, in line with Paragraph 174 of the Operational Guidelines.
In response, the UNESCO
may request additional information on the proposed action from the State Party, including any impact assessments carried out before actions are taken. The Centre reviews this information in close collaboration with the
and, if the situation at a
warrants the attention of the World Heritage Committee, they will put forward a report on the state of conservation of a property at the Committee’s next session. Upon reviewing the case, the Committee may also request an impact assessment, recommend that revisions be made to an existing impact assessment or take a position on the proposed action. If the Committee requests an impact assessment, it is the State Party’s responsibility to ensure that it is carried out and submitted for review, as requested by the Committee following the current Guidance.
Carrying out an impact assessment is generally easier and more effective where there is a robust management system with effective governance measures – data collection is more straightforward, public input is more easily facilitated, and impacts are easier to monitor and manage. However, even if a does not have a well-functioning management system, impact assessment can help to improve proposed actions. For example, the baseline information collected through the impact assessment process can be used for other management purposes; it can act as a catalyst for stakeholders to come together and promote more participatory decision-making; and it can help to define what type of proposed actions are appropriate for the .